Archive for July 26th, 2006


So, after a little bit of deliberation on the subject of my favorite Premiership team, I’ve ended up right back where I started… with Manchester City. I sorta rooted for them last season, but didn’t make the firm commitment. And I’m still not sure I’m giving them the firm commitment, but I’m at least going with them on a trial basis.

And for those of you who could care less about soccer and/or my rooting interests for any sport, you can skip this post. I certainly wouldn’t blame you.

In addition to Man City, I briefly flirted with Tottenham and West Ham. I liked West Ham for a few reasons… the movie Green Street Hooligans not insignificant among them. If you haven’t seen it, rent it sometime. And then just stop the movie as soon as Elijah Wood gets back to America and pretend that’s the end. It’s better that way, trust me.

I also liked the “Forever Blowing Bubbles” song, but it occurred to me that I’d never ever have anyone to sing it with. If West Ham wins a big game, and I take to the streets singing “Forever Blowing Bubbles” at the top of my lungs, all it’s going to do is confuse people and excite men named “Bubbles.” So that was a bit of a downer.

The other thing that attracted me to West Ham was the fact that Clint Dempsey could soon be a transfer target of theirs, and I think Clint Dempsey is the man. But you can’t choose a favorite team based on a favorite player. It doesn’t last.

Once upon a time, I like the New York Rangers because Wayne Gretzky played there… and when Gretzky retired, I found that I hadn’t really grown fond of any of the other Rangers, mainly because, at the time, they were an extremely poorly run organization who employed players who had many vaginalistic qualities. Mistake on my part. And rather than “pick another favorite team,” which you just can’t do, I had to give up the sport all together.

I was really intrigued with Spurs, too, but to be perfectly honest, Bill Simmons selecting them kinda turned me in the other direction. Not that I don’t like Simmons, I do, but I just didn’t want to go the same route. It’s a shame, too, because having a logo comprised of a “cock and ball” would’ve made me positively giddy. But it felt like that badwagon was getting a little crowded.

Which brings us back to Man City. The two biggest factors: the uniforms, and the fact that they’re called “Man City,” which lends itself to a nearly endless stream of jokes about my own sexuality, and I didn’t want to pass that up. I’ve already got nearly a year of experience with them, too, so… it’s probably a bad idea to just throw that away.

But again, this isn’t yet set in stone. I’m certainly leaning that way, and I can’t really predict when it will cement itself. Sometimes, you just have to let a favorite team choose you. So I’m adopting Manchester City right now on a trial basis. We’re dating right now. Manchester City and I are seeing each other exclusively, but we’ve decided to hold off on the physical part of our relationship for the time being. But I hope to be putting the wood to Man City a few weeks into the season. We’ll see how it goes.

This is messed up. Check out the headline for this article:

“Van Slyke on Ozzie: ‘Latinos are hot-headed’”

Now, three paragraphs down, here’s the actual quote from Tigers first base coach, Andy Van Slyke, who was asked about Ozzie Guillen’s recent outburst at the pitcher who refused to bean a guy:

“(Guillen’s) a guy who wears his emotions on his sleeve,” Van Slyke told the radio network. “He is, if you want to call it, an atypical Latin baseball player.

“I don’t believe that it’s true for all Latinos, but a lot of people’s perception is that Latinos are hot-headed. He has certainly shown that he gets a little upset and a little excited about the littlest, silliest things.”

I dunno who wrote that headline (and chances are, it’s not the same person who wrote the article), but man, whoever it was did a serious hack job on Andy Van Slyke. Just completely hung him out to dry. That’s like a guy saying, “I know that the stereotype isn’t true for everyone, but I did once see a black man eating fried chicken,” and the headline the next day reading, “GUY SAYS THAT DARKIES LOVE THE KFC.” The headline is just a complete misrepresentation of what he said.

Van Slyke was, in fact, careful not to make any blanket statements about people of Latin descent… lets give him credit for that, instead of blindsiding him in the headline. How many people just glance at the headline and don’t read the article, and think Andy Van Slyke is a prick right now? That’s not cool. I’d say something about Van Slyke if he did say something offensive, so by the same token, I should probably also defend retired centerfielders who get unfairly railroaded by headline writers.

I went ahead and took a screen capture of it, just in case MSNBC decides to change it, as they damn well should.

And the headline to this little blog item is my own little personal act of vengeance on behalf of Andy Van Slyke. I hope it’s taken in the spirit as it was intended: completely factual.

The word on the street is that Prince is going to be doing the entertaining at next year’s Super Bowl Halftime. Pete McEntegart here in SI.com’s 10 Spot attributes the news to “internet reports,” as if the internet itself is one single entity. I’m not sure where it originated. But I hope it’s true.

Because if you have to put on some giant bullshit halftime show (and clearly, the NFL has to), then, at least in my opinion, there aren’t many options better than Prince. I’d go with Dead Prez, just to see what would happen, but that might just be me.

But who doesn’t love Prince? They should probably have him do it every year. If it was Prince that went out there on stage and had a useless prick rip a patch off of his pants, and exposed his dong for a second… people would’ve just shrugged and said, “Well, it’s Prince, what did you want?”

I haven’t heard “3121,” and I didn’t think all that highly of “Musicology,” but put him in front of a live crowd, and Prince is going to come through. It’s not like there’s a shortage of bad-ass songs in the Prince catalog. If there is truth to this internet report, I’ll be watching the halftime show in 2007, which is not something I normally do.

A brand new minor league football organization is going to be launching next year, and it sounds somewhat promising. Teams are going to be playing on eight college campuses throughout the country, and teams will be stocked with former players from the area and conference they’re representing.

Players also have to be college graduates (hence, no Clarett), and have no college eligibility left. They’ll make about $100,000 per year, so the guys from SEC schools will actually be taking a little bit of a paycut. That’s about it for the available specifics, but if you’ve got $15 million laying around, a team could be yours.

I am of the opinion that there can never be too many sports on TV, but I’d hate to see this happen at the expense of the Arena League. If that $100,000 salary is true (and that seems really high for a start-up league), then Arena’s in trouble. I don’t know if anyone in the Arena League makes even half of that. In fact, I think they all make the same thing, and I’m pretty sure it’s nowhere near the six-figure neighborhood.

Anyway, it’s interesting. More to come, I’m sure.

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.