Archive for October 3rd, 2006

As you may be aware, Congress approved a bill yesterday that pretty much outlaws internet gambling. The bill prohibits credit card companies and other payment services from accepting any kind of online gambling transactions. The internet gambling ban was attached to some kind of port security legislation that’s very likely to be signed by the president in the next couple of weeks.

If you’re wondering why Congress felt it was important to do this… hell, I dunno. It’s one of those shady little deals where a dickhead lawmaker or two won’t let a bigger bill get through unless he also gets to attach some kind of douchebag legislation to it that he and maybe a couple other people want. As for why those people feel it’s important… I imagine it’s because if we gamble over the Internet, the terrorists have already won. Or perhaps we’re supporting terrorism when we do it. Or maybe it’s as simple as the fact that these colors don’t run, so, you know… let’s roll. Mission accomplished.

But if you’re one of those conspiracy theory nutjobs out there who needs a better explanation, Iowa Republican Jim Leach, who sponsored the bill, had this explanation:

“Religious leaders of all denominations and faiths are seeing gambling problems erode family values,” Leach said in a statement. “If Congress had not acted, gamblers would soon be able to place bets not just from home computers, but from their cell phones while they drive home from work or their BlackBerries as they wait in line at the movies.”

AND? You know what that sounds like to me? Convenience. It sounds like an example of someone making good use of the technology available to us. I don’t understand… what happens if someone places a bet over a BlackBerry while waiting in line to see a movie? Really, what happens? Are we concerned that this man won’t be able to focus on the movie because he’s really hoping that the Broncos cover? Would it really be that big of a loss to the nation if this guy wasn’t able to properly enjoy Jackass Number Two?

I guess that’s where we draw the line, when people use cell phones and BlackBerries. That’s when it’s out of hand. You know, I wish drug dealers would think to start using cell phones for drug deals, so then the government could get around to whooping some ass on that War on Drugs. Does this fellow think no one’s ever used a cell phone to place a bet before? Or a BlackBerry, for that matter?

And if religious leaders are concerned about it, then of course we have to act. Because that’s what our great nation is based on: making laws out of the religious values of a few people. That’s what freedom is all about. I feel like listening to a goddamn Lee Greenwood record.

Myself, I’m not really going to miss it. I’ve never placed a sports bet online, and while I’ve played a little bit of poker online, it’s not something I really made a habit of. I hadn’t played in quite some time. But putting a ban on this is absurd and does absolutely nothing to make anyone happier, safer, or better in any way.

One of two things is going to happen. Either the online sites are going to find a loophole, or some way around this… or the gamblers are going to take their business to their local bookie, to underground poker clubs… places where, if they screw up, they get their legs broken.

If you’re looking for an NFL analyst to call out Brett Favre for his poor play… Michael Irvin was your guy last night. Between Tirico, Theismann, Kornheiser, Stuart Scott, Steve Young, Tom Jackson, and Michael Irvin… Irvin was the only guy who would flat out say that Brett Favre is not a real good quarterback right now. Here’s the transcript, following Steve Young making a ton of excuses for Favre’s play:

Irvin: I respect Brett. I’ve watched him play some great games. I’ve played against him a lot of times. But let’s be honest here. First of all, I’m tired of hearing people talk about ‘Well, he’s playing with a lot of young guys.’ Hey man. These guys are in the pros. They will collect checks on Tuesday, no matter what. Second of all, Brett made some bad throws tonight. Bad throws. It wasn’t that his guys were in the wrong place. He made some bad throws, ball in the ground.

Young: Are you saying that I’m covering for him?

Irvin: I don’t know what you’re doing. You’re loving him a little bit too much. I am not violating myself in my job, my obligation is to ESPN.

Young: It’s hard for me to hear a guy who hung out by the Gatorade talk about a quarterback who’s in the hashes every down.

Irvin: I was one of those guys that Brett was hanging out tonight, getting killed. That’s what I’m talking about. He made some bad throws, guys.

And Favre was hanging guys out to dry all night… it seemed like every time Donald Driver attempted to make a catch, his head was getting snapped back by an Eagles safety who had him lined up.

Anyway… that’s as blunt as I’ve ever heard an analyst get on Favre, and there was still room to take it even further. Kudos to The Playmaker.

I’m OK with a five-game suspension for Albert Haynesworth, but that’s about the minimum I’d have been happy with. It is an NFL record suspension for on-field behavior, so I suppose that’s substantial enough. I’d have been happier with 10 games, and I thought the right call was to sit him for the rest of the year. What he did, obviously, was pretty sick and twisted, and he’s got to pay for that.

If you missed any of his heartfelt apologies, here’s a sample:

“What I did out there was disgusting,” Haynesworth said Sunday. “It doesn’t matter what the league does to me. The way I feel right now, you just can’t describe it.”

Well, that’s good. Your contrition is noted and appreciated, but for the purposes of your punishment, it’s also pretty useless. But I think you already know that.

And one thing I also want to note is that while his act was brutal and vicious and unacceptable… things like this do happen. They’re not usually that blatant, they’re not usually that visible to the camera… but you don’t think NFL players do things to intentionally hurt other NFL players from time to time? Under a pile for a loose ball, all kinds of wild shit goes on. Balls are grabbed. People are bitten. People are punched, kicked, etc. I remember an incident in a college game where one player blatantly choked another player after a play. What happened was nuts, but not unprecedented, in my opinion.

And taking it another step further, just to throw it out there for discussion… is it better or worse for Albert Haynesworth to stomp his spikes into someone’s grill, as opposed to a Broncos offensive lineman diving with his helmet or shoulder pad into the side of a defensive lineman’s knee? Is it better or worse than Warren Sapp hospitalizing Chad Clifton, 30 yards away from the ball, with absolutely zero chance to make any impact on a play?

And I know that it’s apples and oranges, and that those two things are technically legal. If if I have my knee caved in by a lineman on a pussy cut block, or if I have my hip shattered by an idiot defensive lineman… what it actually says in the NFL rule book is of little consequence to me. Legal or not, those players did things that were 1) completely unnecessary, and 2) likely to result in serious injury to fellow players (far more serious than 30 stitches to the forehead, by the way), and they damn well knew it.

I know I’m absurdly late on this, but I wanted to mention that I really liked something Steve Spurrier said after South Carolina’s near-loss to Auburn. The Cock fans were applauding the team as they left the field.

“Please don’t clap when we come close. I don’t know if any coach has told our fans, ‘Please don’t clap if we get beat.”

Well, someone had to be the first, and I think it’s a worthwhile message. Drilling a winning mentality into a team is not easy. If a team gets comfortable with losing… it can be nearly impossible to change the attitude surrounding the team. Ask Temple. And if Steve Spurrier feels like his fans are tolerating an atmosphere of losing by applauding a loss, then he should say so. I think he’s absolutely right. The message is, “Do not be content with being a fucking loser, and don’t you people let them feel like it is okay.” Or maybe the message was, “Lou Holtz was a fucking pussy. I am not.” I think it was one of those two.

I bet Spurrier was actually legitimately confused by the fans reaction when he heard it. Think about it… when’s the last time someone applauded him when he lost? It didn’t happen at Florida, and it damn sure didn’t happen with the Redskins. In fact, I don’t think anyone applauded him for anything he did when he was in Washington. He probably started looking around the field for a streaker or a fistfight or something that might be drawing some applause.

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.