Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

FOX Sports had a difficult decision to make. James Brown hosted their previously unwatchable NFL pre-game show, but he left to go host CBS’s almost-as-unwatchable NFL pre-game show. So their options were to hire someone new; perhaps a fresh, new face that could bring something different to the table… or we could get more Joe Buck. We’re getting more Joe Buck.

You may like Joe Buck. There are evidently those who do, as he’s won some Emmys of some kind. Myself, personally, I hate listening to him. He irks the hell out of me. If you want to watch the #1 NFC game of the week, you could end up dealing with about six hours of Joe Buck on Sundays. Even if you like Joe Buck… that’s a hell of a lot of Joe Buck.

Maybe I’m being unfair to Joe Buck here. Who knows, maybe he’ll slide into the host’s chair, be great at it, and I’ll build a great desire to be his close friend. Or maybe he’ll be the same holier-than-thou guy who went Nuts when Randy Moss pretended to pull down his imaginary pants. I don’t know.

But I don’t get why FOX is going to so much trouble, packing up and taking their entire pregame show on the road every week, so Joe Buck can host the studio show, and then go upstairs to the booth to call the game. Why? Was there no one else on the planet who could handle this job? Why so afraid to take a chance on someone new? And if you have to recycle someone, why not hire Pat O’Brien and fire him up with an 8-ball five minutes before he goes on the air?

Anyway, now the FOX pregame roster consists of Jimmy Johnson (fairly useless), Howie Long (somewhat tolerable), Terry Bradshaw (irritating as fuck), and Joe Buck (every bit as irritating as Terry Bradshaw, with the added bonus of being smug as fuck). Can’t wait.

When you watch a sporting event on ABC from now, it’s no longer being presented to you by “ABC Sports.” In fact, that no longer exists. ESPN has swallowed them whole, and any sporting event that appears on ABC from now on, is being brought to you by “ESPN on ABC.” The Little League World Series will be the last event eler televised by ABC Sports.

Gone is the organization that brought you “The Wide World of Sports,” in favor of more from the organization that brought you “Bonds on Bonds.” Actually, I suppose it doesn’t ultimately make any difference to me. ESPN is probably omnipresent enough in my life right now, but what are you going to do? It’s not like I can just stop patronizing ESPN. They’ve got their hooks in me.

Richard Sandomir of the New York Times has done his best to find some teeth-gnashing and hand-wringing about the event, quoting NBC’s Dick Ebersol as saying that his heart weeps for Roone Aldredge’s legacy. Keith Jackson and Dan Dierdorf were also a little bit pissed, mainly about people’s legacies, about which, to be perfectly honest with you, I could not possibly care less.

ABC’s been using ESPN commentators and graphics for a long time now, and I don’t think much actual presentation is going to change. Really, the move is purely masturbatory on the part of ESPN. George Bodenheimer, president of ESPN, had some kind of a line about this enabling ABC and ESPN to better serve fans, but you’ll have to forgive me if I’m a little bit skeptical about his altruism. All the move really does is put get the ESPN brand a little more exposure, which they probably think is going to help them sell some cell phones.

This is messed up. Check out the headline for this article:

“Van Slyke on Ozzie: ‘Latinos are hot-headed’”

Now, three paragraphs down, here’s the actual quote from Tigers first base coach, Andy Van Slyke, who was asked about Ozzie Guillen’s recent outburst at the pitcher who refused to bean a guy:

“(Guillen’s) a guy who wears his emotions on his sleeve,” Van Slyke told the radio network. “He is, if you want to call it, an atypical Latin baseball player.

“I don’t believe that it’s true for all Latinos, but a lot of people’s perception is that Latinos are hot-headed. He has certainly shown that he gets a little upset and a little excited about the littlest, silliest things.”

I dunno who wrote that headline (and chances are, it’s not the same person who wrote the article), but man, whoever it was did a serious hack job on Andy Van Slyke. Just completely hung him out to dry. That’s like a guy saying, “I know that the stereotype isn’t true for everyone, but I did once see a black man eating fried chicken,” and the headline the next day reading, “GUY SAYS THAT DARKIES LOVE THE KFC.” The headline is just a complete misrepresentation of what he said.

Van Slyke was, in fact, careful not to make any blanket statements about people of Latin descent… lets give him credit for that, instead of blindsiding him in the headline. How many people just glance at the headline and don’t read the article, and think Andy Van Slyke is a prick right now? That’s not cool. I’d say something about Van Slyke if he did say something offensive, so by the same token, I should probably also defend retired centerfielders who get unfairly railroaded by headline writers.

I went ahead and took a screen capture of it, just in case MSNBC decides to change it, as they damn well should.

And the headline to this little blog item is my own little personal act of vengeance on behalf of Andy Van Slyke. I hope it’s taken in the spirit as it was intended: completely factual.

As part of the government’s quest to preserve your values, the FCC is asking various networks for tapes of sporting events that could possibly include profanity from players, coaches, and fans. Any little slip-ups are likely to draw huge fines.

Under federal court rulings and commission rules, material is indecent if it “in context, depicts or describes sexual or excretory activities or organs in a patently offensive manner as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium.” Indecent speech can be aired safely between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.

Now, I do believe in a certain amount of “decency” on the airwaves… which might come as a bit of a surprise to you, considering the outright filth that I produce here. But I do believe that when there’s a chance that young kids are watching, the networks have a responsibility to do what they can to keep the language clean, and I would take the bold stand of being against hardcore pornography being broadcast as a lead-in to SpongeBob Squarepants.

But at the same time, I like live television, and I understand that sometimes, you know, people say fuck. Things happen at live sporting events. At certain college arenas, the “asshole” chant is almost tradition. Bill Cowher can’t call a play without using the word “fuck.” I think it’s actually in some of their playcalls. “All right, let’s run Jumbo Right, Fuck 27, Slant Wing Z Cock Deep.”

Things just happen. And I think the networks do everything they can to keep it off the airwaves, with delays and such. But every now and then, a little bit of potty-mouth is going to get through. Broadcasters can be fined as much as $325,000 per violation, under a new law. And if networks keep getting hit with these huge fines, broadcasts are going to get farther and farther away from actually being “live.” Delays will be longer, microphones will get farther and farther from the field, and they’re going to air on the side of caution.

Just seems like the FCC should have better things to spend their time on.

The World Cup Final drew 16.9 million viewers in the United States… a number that shocks me a little bit. I’d have never guessed it would be that high. According to this New York Times article, that’s about 4 million more people than the average rating for an NBA Finals game, it’s almost as much as the 17.5 million that watched the NCAA championship between Florida and UCLA, and it’s roughly half the number of people who have been blown by Paris Hilton. And the 16.9 million people were pulled in on a Sunday afternoon, as opposed to primetime, when it’s a lot easier to bring in a huge audience.

That 16.9 million does include 5 million viewers from Univision, on top of the 11.9 on ABC…. so neither of the individual ratings is going to be setting records. But still, it proves that there’s an audience in America that is, at the very least, soccer-curious. Now, I’m not predicting that the MLS is ever going to take the nation by storm, but if they can improve their marketing, their level of play, and maybe get some help from a decent American performance on the World Cup stage… maybe there’s a market there for them after all.

In light of LeBron’s contract extension in Cleveland, David Sweet at MSNBC.com wonders if LeBron has cost himself a lot of endorsement money by staying in Cleveland, and also that the NBA will suffer for it.

It’s an interesting point, and I’m not a businessman, but… I can’t say I agree. It’s not like this is 1960, and if you wanted to see LeBron James play in that far outpost of Cleveland, the only way to get there was a 9-hour train ride, and then an 18-mile hike through snow-covered mountains inhabited by man-eating woolly mammoths. Basketball is on TV, there is this crazy thing called “the Internet,” and ABC, ESPN, and TNT, I do believe, will find their way to Cleveland to get this LeBron character on television. SportsCenter might even have a segment or two on him.

There may have been reasons that it was a bad idea for LeBron to sign in Cleveland, but I don’t know if I buy the major media market thing anymore. I don’t see Jamal Crawford and Channing Frye pulling in huge endorsement deals because they play for the Knicks. Brett Favre does pretty well with the endorsements, and he plays in Green fucking Bay. It’s just a smaller world now, and stars are going to be stars, no matter where they play. LeBron has more of an effect on Cleveland than Cleveland has on LeBron.

I can’t decide if I like this game, or if I fucking hate it. I’m pretty sure it’s nowhere inbetween. As I play, I’m either thinking, “This is fun,” or “I can’t believe I just spent three hours doing this.”

The game is supposed to mimic the experience of an NFL Head Coach, and while I’ve never been an NFL Head Coach, I’m pretty sure that it doesn’t even come close to that experience. Not that I’d expect it to, really, but you know, I don’t think a coach schedules four hours of “office hours” everyday where he does absolutely nothing.

The game starts at the end of last-season. You create a coach, determine what he looks like, what he wears (unfortunately a pretty plaid skirt isn’t an option, if you’re looking to build a Mike Holmgren clone), and some very basic things about coaching philsophy, like 4-3 defense, or 3-4, west coast offense, or balanced, etc.

I don’t remember much of the off-season that took place before the draft, mainly because I was bored to tears. I don’t know if that was the best strategy for the EA people… having the first part of the game be the most mind-numbingly boring. And then strike two came pretty quickly with the draft. I traded Drew Brees (inexplicably still on the Bolts roster) for the 10th pick in the draft, where I took Santonio Holmes, who, dealing another blow to the EA game’s realism, does not come with a lengthy criminal record. And then Vince Young fell to me at 19th (Reggie Bush didn’t go until 7th).

But the second strike took place when none of my draft picks actually made it to my team. There was no draft pick signing period… apparently my roster was full, and thus, my draft picks were automatically released to the free agent pool. No warning, no opportunity to cut anyone… they were just gone.

But I kept wading through until I got the preseason, and things got better. The week before a game, the game is structured so you have four tasks a day. Two of them, you can determine on your own, and two of them are “office hours,” which allows you to sit at your desk and do anything you want, which will be absolutely nothing. You can’t do anything–propose a trade, call a free agent, cut a player, ogle a cheerleader–without scheduling for it. And if you want to schedule time for a trade, it has to come at the expense of a practice. You can’t replace your “office hours.”

But the practices are useful. You select the type of practice you want, who you want to work out, contact or non-contact, and then do it. The more you practice guys through the week, the better they’ll be during the game. And the more you practice certain plays, the more effective they’ll be for you during the game. That part, I liked.

You’ll also have meetings scheduled… some to get a scouting report on your upcoming opponent (which is fairly in-depth, even if it will have you believing that Kerry Collins can be the greatest QB ever), some to talk to your assistant coaches and/or owner (the dialogue is pretty bad and gets repetitive quickly), where they’ll make suggestions on starters, or tell you what positions are ready or not ready to go. You also build “trust” levels with coaches, though I’ve yet to see any useful application for these ratings.

Which brings us to the best part of the game, the games themselves. Coaching these things is pretty damn fun, though it does have its own limitations. You call your plays, of course, and at any point, you can elect to talk to your guys on the bench. Your options for talking to them are “aggressive” or “passive.” Passive is sometimes a compliment, sometimes a mild rebuke… and aggressive is usually yelling at a guy. I don’t really do a lot of this.

The cool thing is, pre-snap, how you can instruct your QB. I have Vince Young set permanently to look to scramble, and he does so effectively. But you can tell him on individual plays to lock onto his primary receiver, protect the ball, look downfield, get rid of it quickly, take a deep drop, put on a fucking helmet if he’s going to plow into an old lady’s windshield, all sorts of things. And there are additional adjustments you can make… audibles, hot routes, shifting your line protection, etc. Disappointingly, there is no pre-snap option to flip the play and run it to the other side.

Defensively, the pre-snap options are a little disappointing. With your line and linebackers, you can shift them, but not really change anyone’s assignment. How bad is that? You can do these things in the ’06 version of Madden, but not in the ’07 version of Head Coach? You can’t manually decide to double-team a receiver, or make someone blitz.

But coaching the game, again, can be fun. I celebrate these touchdowns probably more than I do when I score them on my own in Madden. And I’m cruising… I’ve gone through four preseason games, and one regular season game, and I’ve yet to lose. The first game I played, I eeked out a 21-18 win over Green Bay, and since then, it’s been four blowouts. Chicago, Minnesota, San Francisco, and in the Monday Night opener, the Raiders, have all gotten the MJD-beatdown. Routs, all of them. The game might just be too easy.

So that’s where I am with it. Overall, I’m disappointed… it feels like they missed so many opportunities to make this thing truly in-depth. Any test-based PC game could easily destroy everything in this game that isn’t the actual game. But, that said, I can’t deny that the games themselves are fun. I’m gonna give it another few days before deciding to take it back.

I’m just wondering if maybe the NHL gets a little too much media attention. This probaly isn’t going to be popular, but… I think it’s a legitimate question to ask. Everyone knows how bad hockey’s TV ratings have been. I’m not trying to twist that knife, but… given the general disinterest of the general populace towards hockey, perhaps ESPN and other sports media outlets are giving it a little bit too much attention.

Game Seven led SportsCenter… and ESPN.com did one of those special half-page graphics for it. It was the big story of the day, and while it doesn’t quite get the same SportsCenter treatment as the Super Bowl, World Series, or NBA Finals… it’s not that far below. Is that as it should be? I don’t know what the Game 7 ratings were, but… Game Six of a very competitive series got an embarrassing 1.2. That’s like a UPN number. No need to rehash all the individual ratings, but hey, Game 7 notwithstanding, they’re turtle’s dick low.

I’m just wondering if, for example, Arena Football fans get pissed off when the NHL leads SportsCenter, while Arena Football brings in better TV ratings. On the surface at least, they’d seem to have a point… as would fans of the WNBA or women’s college softball. Maybe the TV ratings aren’t the end-all, be-all…and maybe there’s something to be said for the intensely loyal nature of hockey fans. But I still think it’s fair to at least ask if maybe ESPN should move it down the list a little bit.

ESPN is starting to slip a little bit on their attention to detail. Yesterday on PTI, Kornheiser and Wilbon were talking about how Kobe Bryant will be doing an advice column in the LA Times. They talked about it, made some jokes, and Tony did say, “We don’t know if this is true or not,” but they were treating it very seriously.

Well, Tony, I know if it’s true or not. I 100% sure that it’s not true. How do I know this? Because the person who wrote the thing also wrote just below it “This was a joke.” That’s what tipped me off. I lack the resources of the ESPN research department, but I was able, through some of my own determination and sluething skills, to determine that this was not true.

Worldwide Leader, huh? In what, not being able to read? I understand that people make mistakes, and I’ve done some dumb things here, but… hey, I’m not ESPN. That’s a big one. And it’s not really that someone fooled them, either. The person at LakersTalk.net, where ESPN picked the story up, was just fucking around. It was not an attempt to pull a fast one. He was making a joke. It’s been up on the site for 7 days, and for six of those days, it has said, “This was a joke” directly underneath it. And ESPN just got to it yesterday.

Maybe it shouldn’t be, but it’s just so hard for me to believe that ESPN bit on this. Just completely asleep at the wheel in Bristol. I’m sure that the LakersTalk.net person expected only a few chuckles from his/her own readers, and that was it. It must’ve been a hell of a shock to see it on ESPN a few days later. I’m expecting a PTI bit next week about how Flip Saunders owns a turtle that’s capable of writing letters sometime next week.


I’m not comfortable with this. It’s just my own personal preference, and I’m probably about to sound like a crotchety old man, but… Rox? Really? Is that necessary? Is it that much more difficult to type the extra two characters and call them the Rocks? Who’s writing the headlines for the AP now, Sal Masekela?

That’s all I have to say about it. I mean, I understand that this is not the Rockies are not a franchise steeped in tradition, but at the same time, this isn’t the WNBA, either. This is not Arena Football. This is not the X Games. I guess I’m just not extreme enough for this newfangled phonetic craze.

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.