I’ve seen it talked about in a number of places recently. That Mark McGwire is a baseball pariah because of the perception that he used steroids, while “no one cares” that Shawne Merriman was framed busted for steroids. And maybe this is coming from a personal place, and not a particularly objective place, but I don’t see it. I don’t see the evidence that “no one cares” about Merriman’s steroid use. What I don’t see is this:
ROYALS ALL-STAR Mike Sweeney saw the recent Hall of Fame voting results and made a good point.
“It breaks my heart that a guy like [Mark] McGwire has been persecuted for something he never tested positive for or never admitted to,” Sweeney told the Kansas City Star, “yet there are guys playing on Sundays in the NFL that tested positive and people just seem to cover that up.”
He probably meant ignore rather than cover up. Still, his argument is a good one. Shawne Merriman led the NFL in sacks with 17. Maybe he would have had more if he didn’t have to sit out four games because of a steroid suspension.
Or maybe he wouldn’t have gotten to 17 without the juice. Merriman finished third in defensive player of the year voting and will be in uniform for the Chargers playoff game on Sunday.
McGwire? His reputation is slightly south of a snake’s belly.
Merriman did sit out, chief. Barry Bonds ever have to sit out a game?
Where are these people? Where are these people that completely accept steroid use in football? Where are these people that see Shawne Merriman and say, “Hey, that guy’s fast!” with no mention of steroids? I don’t think these people exist. I’ve never met one … and believe, I would damn sure like to.
I can’t watch 10 seconds of a Chargers game without some dickhead friend of mine injecting his ass with an air-syringe. I called a friend the other day to talk about Junior Seau’s being accused of some not-so-nice things, and he stretched himself out for some kind of “What, did he take a bunch of steroids like all San Diego linebackers?” joke. I was embarrassed for him, and then I had to insult his mother. You think I enjoyed that? You think I enjoyed telling this guy that I’m going to have to spend a week-and-a-half washing his mother’s feta-cheese stench off of me?
You’ll find people on both sides of the Mark McGwire/HOF debate, while I’ve found almost no one but myself on my side of the Shawne Merriman/Postseason Awards debate … which is odd, because it’s pretty much the exact same argument.
My point is that I think people do care about Merriman’s positive pee-pee test. And I’m not complaining about that, I would absolutely expect them to care … and the second I heard about it, I could glimpse the years and years of abuse for which I had just signed up.
But the “people care about McGwire, but don’t care about Merriman” thing … well, I think someone made that up. I don’t see any evidence of it. A first-time positive test in baseball gets someone suspended for 50 games. 30.9% of the season. A first-time positive in football gets a guy 4 games. 25% of the season. Ooooh, big difference.
What it is, I believe, is a sneaky little way for the learned, cultured, refined baseball fans of the world to cast stones at the illiterate meathead football fans of the word. “Hey, we care about this horrible tragedy, and you don’t. It’s really a shame that football fans are such simple-minded, paste-eating dolts, while our noble hearts bleed.”
Garbage.


